Search engine optimization has come full circle in the last couple of years.

Back in the mid 1990s it was easy to achieve high search engine rankings. Just tweak your META tags and site copy with keywords and submit. Then, as more and more webmasters started to catch on to META Tags, it became more difficult to beat the competition. Many companies turned to spam tactics such as hidden text (the same color as the background of the page), hidden links (using 1 x 1 pixel gifs to hide them), doorway pages stuffed with keywords and cloaked content, all designed to be seen by search engine robots and not humans in an attempt to trick the search engines into giving the site a higher ranking.

Thankfully, over the past few years, achieving high search rankings has become fairer and more straight-forward. The search engines have given less weighting to META tags and more relevancy weighting to sites that are popular, of high quality and contain unique, relevant information. Most search engines have developed comprehensive spam filters that weed out the spammers from the legitimate sites and penalize sites caught trying to cheat the system. Google in particular has led the charge for quality over quantity.

Fortunately, the web site aspects that most search engines prefer are also those that visitors prefer. Build a quality site with plenty of text, up-to-date, relevant content that other sites link to, a solid navigation system, submit it by hand to popular directories and search engines and you will be on your way to high rankings in no time. It's not difficult, it's not tricky and it certainly doesn't involve any black magic.

That's why I find it difficult to understand search engine optimizers who party like it's 1999 - using invisible text and hidden links in some pathetic, misguided attempt to trick the search engines into believing their site content is the most relevant. I mean, what are they thinking? I've heard excuses like "the search engine guidelines are unclear so we have no choice but to push the envelope". Give me a break. The search engine guidelines are quite obvious to those who are actually good at SEO and understand what is necessary to achieve results for their clients. Many search engines even publish their guidelines clear as day on their sites. Unfortunately, it seems this industry is still full of lazy non-performers who prefer to rely on outdated cheat sheets that haven't worked for years.

I am so sick of all the cowboy SEO firms who clog up the search engine indices with meaningless keyword-stuffed pages, in a vain attempt to dominate the search rankings with their client's sites. Don't they do any research? Don't they read the search engine guidelines? Don't they understand these tactics are fruitless and ineffective? Don't they know these techniques haven't worked for years and are regarded as spamming? Don't they realize they are putting their client's sites at risk of ranking penalties or outright banning? Don't they care about the long term effects and the future of their client's web sites?

If you suspect a site is using spamming techniques, try right clicking the page with your mouse and choose "select all". Run your mouse over the entire page and you might see hidden links to doorway pages. View the source code of a page and you might see other tactics in play. Sometimes a web page will have have little arrows in near invisible font at the bottom of the page. I've seen a few pages where each of those arrows leads to another doorway page stuffed with more keywords. I've even seen examples of companies hiding thousands of keywords in CSS tags or tables that are coded to an extreme left or right position so they don't actually appear on the visible page.

What is the point of these tactics? Even if they go unreported, Google will eventually locate the spam and degrade or ban the pages. It makes no sense to me why SEO firms would take such risks with their client's sites when it is so much easier to get good results using the methods recommended by the search engines.

But as bad as spammy SEO firms are, there are worse offenders. These are the spammy SEO firms who like to propagate myth and legend by publishing articles that are misleading, deceptive and often downright false. No wonder webmasters are confused when it comes to search engines and no wonder there are more cowboy SEO spammers springing up every day. With the amount of incorrect information floating around out there, it is extremely difficult for newcomers to sort out fact from fiction.

The sad thing is that many of these spam propagators justify their rubbish with endorsements from big name marketers or influential advertising agencies who allow them to speak at seminars or be regularly quoted in the media, spreading their misinformation by doing so. It really rankles me when I see faulty advice being circulated to unsuspecting webmasters. That's why I set up Search Engine College - to educate webmasters in the RIGHT way to optimize and market their sites. Another common spam tactic I see is the use of a NoFrames tag on a site that isn't built with frames. I am almost certain Google would have a problem with a site using content designed to be hidden from viewers and shown only to search engines by misleading use of a tag meant for a frames-based page. What type of example are these people trying to set? To think some are actually using these tactics on client sites without the knowledge of their clients is beyond comprehension.

So what can you do to fight back the spam propagators? For starters:

1) Study the search engine guidelines such as those outlined at:

http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html

http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/deletions/deletions-05.html

http://insite.lycos.com/searchservices/tutorial.asp

2) Circulate articles like this one to other webmasters

3) Spend time in knowledgeable webmaster forums such as http://www.ihelpyouservices.com/forums/

4) Make sure you report any cases of search engine spamming to Google (http://www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html) and the other search engines as soon as you spot them.

When we cut spammers off at the source, we can stop the spread of misinformation and all benefit from the results.

About this author

Article by Kalena Jordan, one of the first search engine optimization experts in Australia, who is well known and respected in the industry, particularly in the U.S. As well as running her own SEO business Web Rank (www.webrank.biz), Kalena manages Search Engine College (www.searchenginecollege.com), an online training institution offering instructor-led short courses and downloadable self-study courses in Search Engine Optimization and Search Engine Marketing subjects.

 

Related articles

How To Avoid Search Engine Spamming?
Search Engine Spamming also known as Spamdexing (spamming and indexing) is the practice of deliberately manipulating web pages to obtain high search engine rankings. Spamdexing is used to mislead search engines indexing program and to gain ranking position which they do not deserve.

Black Hat SEO and the Sneaky Redirect
The dangers of Black Hat SEO. Some popular SEO tactics should be avoided in order to maintain your good search engine ranking. One of these tactics includes the Sneaky Redirection Page.

ARTICLES: General Internet Marketing Website Development Search Engines Archives Submit an Article
WEBMASTER TOOLS: RSS Parser Keyword Density Checker Verify Your Site Links Backlink Checker Check Indexed Pages What's Your Website Worth